A comparison of text difficulty in systemic assessment using Lexile theory

Author: 
Roux, Karen
Responsibility: 
Mtsatse, Nangamso, jt. author
Long, Caroline, jt. author
Publisher: 
NISC
Date published: 
2018
Record type: 
Journal Title: 
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies
Source: 
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies , Vol. 36, No. 4, 2018, pp. 291-300
Abstract: 

In South Africa, the use of systemic assessments is controversial, raising issues of fairness. However, an argument can be made that they yield valuable insights into the current levels of literacy and education in the country. National systemic assessments are used to gauge scholastic progress across schools and provinces, while international tests provide some measure of comparability across countries. This article investigates the Lexile(r) Framework for Reading as an educational tool for gauging the reading difficulty of texts used in national and international assessments conducted in South Africa. The results of the Lexile analyses showed that the reading difficulty of the Annual National Assessments (ANA), conducted in 2014, varied between grades and did not match the same grade level in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). We argue that by using the Lexile framework during the designing phase of assessment, and selecting texts that are level appropriate for the learners, the assessment process may be enhanced.

Language: 
Region focus: 
Country focus: 

CITATION: Roux, Karen. A comparison of text difficulty in systemic assessment using Lexile theory . : NISC , 2018. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies , Vol. 36, No. 4, 2018, pp. 291-300 - Available at: http://library.africa-union.org/comparison-text-difficulty-systemic-assessment-using-lexile-theory

Printer-friendly version Send by email